1부 · 기초 다지기 — 04화

Planning a Research Project

Chapter purpose. By the end of this chapter, you should be able to apply the central concepts to a real assignment, research paper, thesis, or article in your own discipline.

The research cycle

A research project usually moves through problem identification, preliminary reading, question development, design, ethical review where required, data collection, analysis, drafting, revision, and dissemination. The process is iterative: reading may refine a question, pilot data may change an instrument, and analysis may expose the need for a clearer conceptual definition.

Feasibility before ambition

A valuable question must also be answerable with the available time, access, knowledge, language resources, and data. Narrowing a project is not intellectual failure. It is a methodological decision that allows the writer to make a defensible claim. International students should account for unfamiliar administrative processes, translation needs, and time for communication when estimating a schedule.

Project management

Convert the research cycle into dated outputs: a one-page problem statement, an annotated source set, a question-method matrix, an ethics submission, a cleaned dataset, an analysis memo, and section drafts. Record decisions and file versions. A research log should state what changed, why it changed, and what evidence supported the change.

Managing risk

Common risks include delayed participant access, unusable data, overly broad questions, unclear authorship roles, and late discovery of formatting requirements. Identify a mitigation strategy for each major risk. For example, confirm data access before committing to a study design, and obtain the official thesis template before formatting the final document.

Planning around Korean institutional milestones

A workable project plan begins with institutional deadlines and moves backward. For a thesis, map proposal approval, ethics review when applicable, recruitment or data access, analysis, committee review, similarity checking, formatting review, defense, corrections, and repository submission. Names and sequences vary by university and department; verify them in the current graduate-school and departmental rules rather than relying on another student's memory. Create two schedules. The compliance schedule contains fixed external dates and required approvals. The research schedule contains adjustable work packages, dependencies, buffers, and decision points. Do not schedule data collection before any required ethics approval or permission. Do not assume that a supervisor can review a full thesis immediately before an administrative deadline. Send a realistic review request that identifies the document, its stage, the type of feedback needed, and the date by which feedback would remain useful. Risk planning is not pessimism. Record at least one alternative for recruitment failure, delayed equipment, restricted database access, transcription volume, software incompatibility, and nonresponse from a partner organization. A smaller, more complete study is usually stronger than an ambitious project that cannot adequately document or analyze its evidence.